Hybrid
Selection and Marketing Implications for Genetically Modified Corn
Greg Stewart, OMAFRA
and Brian Doidge, Ridgetown College, University of Guelph
April 28, 1999
Announcements
by corn processors, first in the United States, and now more recently in
Ontario, that they will reject genetically modified corn hybrids which have
not been approved for importation and usage in the European Union (EU) have
sent a wave of confusion through the corn industry.
The U.S. Corn Refiners Associations, Inc., took the lead on this issue by
releasing a statement on April 15, 1999 which explained that although corn
processors do not export genetically modified organisms (GMO) requiring
EU regulatory approval, they do export corn products to Europe, especially
gluten feeds and corn oil. Food processors in the EU request that varieties
of transgenic corn not approved in the EU not be used at domestic processing
facilities where processed products are produced for export. Table 1 outlines
the genetically modified events that so far have not received EU approval.
Corn hybrids containing these non-EU approved events would therefore not
be used by members of the Corn Refiners Association. Subsequently, Archer
Daniels Midland and A.E.Staley, two large U.S. wet millers, announced on
April 16 that they would not accept non-EU approved hybrids. Corn Products
International, and therefore Casco, followed suit on April 23.
|
Table
1. Genetic modification events not approved for importation or usage
in the European Union.
|
| Event(s) |
Trait |
| Mon
GA21 (Monsanto Roundup Ready) |
Resistance
to Roundup herbicide |
| DBT
418 (Dekalb BT Xtra) |
Protection
from European Corn Borer |
| DLL
25 (Dekalb GR) |
Resistance
to Liberty herbicide |
| Mon
810 + Mon GA21 (Monsanto Yieldgard and Monsanto Roundup Ready, stacked) |
European
Corn Borer protection and resistance to Roundup herbicide |
| Mon
810 + T25 (Monsanto Yieldgard and AgrEvo Liberty Link, stacked) |
European
Corn Borer protection and resistance to Liberty herbicide |
| T14
(AgrEvo Liberty Link) |
Resistance
to Liberty herbicide |
| CBH
351 (AgrEvo Starlink) |
European
Corn Borer protection |
Know Before You Grow
It should be pointed
out that all of the events listed in Table 1 (with the exception of CBH 351)
are fully registered for domestic use. Also it must be noted that the vast
majority of genetically modified corn hybrids (i.e. nearly all Bt hybrids)
that will be used in Ontario in 1999 are approved for export to the European
Union. This fact is reflected in Table 2, which lists the non-EU approved
hybrids which are marketed in Ontario. If a producer is in possession of non-approved
hybrids his course of action over the next day or two will depend largely
on his marketing options. For those who direct all or most of their corn to
feed usage on their own farms or local operations the need to change hybrids
is minimal. Producers are urged however to check with local users of corn
in regards to these decisions. Corn producers who move the majority of their
corn into what would could be considered a potential export market may need
to be more cautious. To our knowledge at present, Casco, Commercial Alcohols,
and Nacan have decided to not accept non-EU approved GMO corn as have most
other industrial users. Pet food processors, especially if they export to
Europe, may not accept such corn. Therefore, some elevators and dealers may
not accept it either. It is possible that only a few elevators and dealers
will still accept it (those with the capability of segregating, handling,
and storing separately). It is probable that non-EU approved GMO corn might
face a discount when sold because of limited marketing flexibility.
|
Table
2. Corn hybrids marketed in Ontario which are not approved for importation
or usage in the European Union.
|
| Seed
Company Non-EU approved hybrids |
|
| Dekalb |
DK364BtX,
DK468BtX, DK493BtX, DK566BtX
DK325GR, DK345GR, DK385GR, DK417GR, DK493GR
DK335RR, DK359RR, DK387RR, DK448RR, DK493RR, DK520RR, DK545RR, DK545RR/BtY |
| Pioneer |
34T14,
38B22 |
| Zeneca-Garst |
8756RR |
Note: Although every effort has been made
to ensure the accuracy and completeness of this list growers are advised to
clarify any concerns with seed company representatives.
Know Where You Grow
Those producers who eventually
are successful at navigating through, and potentially profiting from these
challenges brought on by biotechnology will be those who can meet the demands
of market fragmentation. You, as the producer of the corn, are the only person
in the chain from seed to end product who knows for certain what was planted
and what was harvested. It would appear that dealers and processors, who decide
to reject non-EU approved GMO hybrids, will require a statement from the producer
certifying that only approved GMO hybrids were grown and that segregation
procedures were followed. Thorough protection of your position as a grower
may eventually require that you have records outlining isolation techniques
(pollen from neighbouring non-approved hybrids may contaminate your corn)
as well as procedures taken to ensure that inadvertent contamination did not
occur at the combine, wagon, truck, elevator leg, drier, bin, or auger. You
will need to know how to handle and possibly be able to document that you
cleaned equipment thoroughly and segregated EU approved GMO corn prior to,
during, and following harvest.
Monitoring
Traditionally there
has been no quick, economical test available for use at a receiving elevators
or processors to detect GMO corn. These testing procedures used at large labs
(mostly in the U.S.), require samples to be taken and forwarded, are expensive,
and take about 2 weeks, thus precluding any delivery point monitoring. However,
Dr. Emerson Nafziger, University of Illinois commented on the potential for
corn processors to monitor received corn. One new development this year is
the very recent appearance of test kits for some of the genetic modifications.
These will be simple, easy to use with either grain or plant material, and
will give readings quickly. The ones I have heard about so far detect approved
Bt events and thus won't be much help to prevent the entry of unapproved hybrids.
Development of new kits to find unapproved hybrids may well happen quickly
though and such tests may become available for use at delivery points. In
short, it is not a good idea to plan to sneak unapproved corn into places
that have said they won't take it.
Hopefully the issues concerning the management of genetically modified corn
hybrids can be sorted out smoothly in the months ahead. Producers will need
to stay informed as situations may change rapidly. For the most part this
will mean working closely with both those who sell you seed as well as those
who buy your corn.