Traditionally An Eye On Ears
  by Greg Stewart, OMAFRA Corn Specialist 
  
  
     
      |  | 
     
      | Figure 
          1Giberella ear rot infection usually occurs from the tip down. Note 
          the dark pink to red colour.
 | 
  
  Ear mould on 
    corn has been a long-time concern to corn growers within the province, especially 
    those that feed the vast majority of their corn to livestock. The conditions 
    that lead to ear mould problems in the grain are not very well understood. 
    The last significant occurrence of ear mould was in 1999. This was a surprise 
    to most since that growing season was dominated by hot dry conditions and 
    not the type of weather we would expect to foster ear mould growth. 
  
  Although the reasons for these sporadic and sometime unexpected ear mould 
  outbreaks are unclear it may be related to one or all of the following:
  
  1) poor ear fill, predisposing the ear to infection
  2) heat and drought stress
  3) a large number of foggy or mist-filled mornings in August and September 
  (moisture enhances infection possibilities)
  4) ear damage by insects creating infection entry points
  
  As I write this article, about the only thing that I am sure of is that 
  in the 2003 growing season we had more than our share of high humidity and 
  foggy mornings during the pollination and early grainfill period. 
    Insect and bird activity on the ears was perhaps slightly higher than normal 
    as well.
  
  Hopefully, dry conditions in September and on into the harvest season will 
  suppress any mould growth. However, as a precaution, corn producers are 
  advised to scout fields for ear mould. Fields should be first targeted for 
  scouting where the crop has been under more stress than normal, or where 
  insect or bird damage had been noticed earlier in the season. You may also 
  consider targeting fields where wheat was grown last year as having the 
  potential for greater infection. Scouting 5 fields may reveal 4 mould-free 
  fields and one with severe mould. Infection in fields is sporadic, often 
  field specific. In addition, some hybrids appear more prone than others 
  to fusarium. In fields where there is no mould growth there is no risk of 
  mycotoxin production.
  
  The most common and important ear mould in Ontario is Gibberella zeae, which 
  is the sexual reproductive stage of Fusarium graminearium. This fungus not 
  only infects corn but also small grains such as wheat, where it causes Fusarium 
  Head Blight. 
  
  Although, the Gibberella fungus can produce a white mould that makes it 
  difficult to tell apart from Fusarium ear rot, the two can be distinguished 
  easily, when Gibberella produces its characteristic red or dark pink (purple) 
  mould (Figure 1). 
  
  Infection begins through the silk channel and thus, in most cases starts 
  at the ear tip. In severe cases, most of the ear may be covered with mould 
  growth. Corn silks are most susceptible 2-10 days after initiation, and 
  hence the concern over cool, wet or high humidity weather during this period.
  
  Gibberella ear rot is economically important not only because of the potential 
  yield and quality losses but because Gibberella zeae and Fusarium graminearum 
  produce two very important mycotoxins that occur in Ontario - deoxynivalenol 
  (vomitoxin or DON) and zearalenone. These mycotoxins are especially important 
  to swine and other livestock producers since they can have a detrimental 
  effect on their animals. Feed containing low levels of vomitoxin (1 ppm) 
  can result in poor weight gain and feed refusal in swine. Zearalenone is 
  an estrogen and causes reproductive problems such as infertility and abortion 
  in livestock, especially swine. Feed grain that originated in a field with 
  5% or more Gibberella ear rot should be tested for these toxins.
  
  If you encounter mould problems, it does not necessarily mean that the mycotoxins 
  (i.e. vomitoxin, zearalenone, fumonisin, T-2) produced by the moulds are 
  present yet in the grain. The likelihood of mycotoxin production increases 
  on corn where the mould is deep pink or purple in colour. Samples should 
  be taken and sent to a lab for mycotoxin analysis. Also remember, mycotoxins, 
  depending on their concentrations in the feed can be readily detected on 
  the farm. Zearalenone in feed eaten by eight week old gilts will cause redness 
  and swelling of the vulva in 4 to 10 days. Similarly, vomitoxin or T-2 may 
  result in noticeably reduced feed intake in 8-week-old piglets after just 
  a few days on the infected feed. 
  
  Harvest Precautions 
  to Minimize Impact of Fusarium Infected Corn  
   There are 
    several precautions that can be undertaken during harvest to reduce the 
    impact of fusarium infected corn.
    
    1. First, harvest infected fields early. Mycotoxin levels have the potential 
    to build the longer you leave the corn in the field. Once corn moisture 
    is below 18%, the fusarium fungus is dormant and ceases to produce mould.
    2. High temperature drying stops mould growth and mycotoxin production 
    but does not reduce mycotoxins already present. Quick drying is preferred 
    over low heat drying. Be wary of low temperature in bin dryers for mouldy 
    corn and be sure proper ventilation requirements are met for storing dry 
    corn. Keep in mind that there is moisture variability across the field, 
    therefore, wet pockets above 18% moisture can still produce moulds. 
    3. Set the combine to provide high levels of wind to blow out the lighter 
    infected kernels. The fusarium fungus results in lower kernel stability, 
    resulting in higher incidence of mycotoxins in fines (kernel tips and 
    red dog) and cob pieces. 
    4. Sacrifice the tip kernels by running the combine at full capacity with 
    concave settings wide open and cylinder speed set low. Screens on the 
    bottom of the grain elevator, the bottom of the return elevator and on 
    the unload auger will also help screen out the fines.
    5. In corn silage, the acids produced during proper ensilage will stop 
    the growth of moulds. Where there is improper fermentation, moulds could 
    continue to produce mycotoxins and lead to higher toxin levels that could 
    affect cattle.
  Back 
    to Top